+import java.io.{PrintWriter, StringWriter, File, FileWriter}
import sbt._
import org.scalatools.testing.{Event => TEvent, Result => TResult}
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger
-import java.io.{File, FileWriter}
object SbtTapReporting extends Plugin {
- lazy val tapListener = new SbtTapListener
+ def apply() = new SbtTapListener
}
/**
var fileWriter: FileWriter = _
override def doInit {
- println("doInit called in sbt tap plugin")
new File("test-results").mkdirs()
- fileWriter = new FileWriter("test-results/test.tap")
+ fileWriter = new FileWriter(
+ scala.util.Properties.envOrElse("SBT_TAP_OUTPUT", "test-results/test.tap")
+ )
}
def startGroup(name: String) {}
case TResult.Success => writeTapFields("ok", testId.incrementAndGet(), "-", e.testName())
case TResult.Error | TResult.Failure =>
writeTapFields("not ok", testId.incrementAndGet(), "-", e.testName())
- // TODO: for exceptions, write stack trace to tap file.
+ // According to the TAP spec, as long as there is any kind of whitespace, this output should belong to the
+ // the test that failed and it should get displayed in the UI.
+ // TODO:It would be nice if we could report the exact line in the test where this happened.
+ writeTapFields(" ", stackTraceForError(e.error()))
case TResult.Skipped =>
// it doesn't look like this framework distinguishes between pending and ignored.
- writeTapFields("ok", testId.incrementAndGet(), "#", "skip", e.testName())
+ writeTapFields("ok", testId.incrementAndGet(), e.testName(), "#", "skip", e.testName())
}
}
}
fileWriter.close()
}
- private def writeTapFields(s: Any*) { fileWriter.write(s.mkString("", " ", "\n")) }
+ private def writeTapFields(s: Any*) {
+ fileWriter.write(s.mkString("", " ", "\n"))
+ fileWriter.flush()
+ }
+ private def stackTraceForError(t: Throwable): String = {
+ val sw = new StringWriter()
+ val printWriter = new PrintWriter(sw)
+ t.printStackTrace(printWriter)
+ sw.toString
+ }
def endGroup(name: String, t: Throwable) { }
def endGroup(name: String, result: TestResult.Value) { }